Fee - UAH 151 per hour and constant delays in payments: how can lawyers continue to work?

Half of the lawyers involved by the state in providing citizens with free secondary legal aid consider the biggest problem of the existing system to be the payment for the services they have already provided, including the insufficient level of funding.
These are the results of the survey, which were taken into account by the UNBA Committee on Legal Aid in the preparation of the Report on topical issues of the functioning of the legal aid system in Ukraine. Its presentation was held on March 19.
Among the problems related to the payment for services, the attorneys interviewed in the course of the survey noted:
- constant delays in payments;
- low level of payment for services;
- charging for less time than is actually spent on the case;
- insufficient state funding;
- the need to submit a significant number of documents for payment;
- confusion of the charging system.
Olena Demyanova, Secretary of the UNBA Committee on Legal Aid, who participated in the preparation of the report, said that the Methodology for payment for services (Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 465 of 17.09.2014) is based on the amount of payment for the work of a lawyer per hour, which is currently 151 UAH. At the same time, it is the Methodology that determines how much time a lawyer will be paid for providing a particular type of assistance, regardless of the actual time spent. «For example, a pre-trial investigation should take 5 to 7 hours; a trial should take 13 to 16 hours; participation in a criminal proceeding in a court of appeal should take 6 to 8 hours. This includes participation in procedural actions and court hearings, preparation, collection of evidence, communication with the client, etc, - said the lawyer. - Obviously, this is absolutely not the time that a lawyer spends on providing legal aid. In her opinion, these rules have long been in need of revision».
She also drew attention to certain types of legal aid that the Methodology ignores altogether. For example, the UNBA receives complaints about the lack of payment for attorneys' requests in civil cases. Although this is an extremely important part of legal aid, which takes a lot of time.
In addition, the Methodology contains demotivating algorithms that do not take into account the real positive results of the work of advocates. For example, if a lawyer has obtained a probationary sentence for his client, but there is only one episode of the prosecution, this is not considered a positive result. Also, it is not considered a positive result if the investigator and prosecutor do not apply to the court for a preventive measure in the form of detention in respect of a detained person. «There are a lot of such cases, - comments O. Demyanova. - They distort the structure of relations and negatively affect the desire to work».
The report also pays attention to the problem of constant delays in payment, instability and unpredictability of the terms of settlements with lawyers.
«The FLA system in terms of funding for lawyers is completely non-transparent. Advocates do not know how much money they are owed, when it will be received, what are the available terms of repayment, - says a representative of the UNBA Committee. - Every lawyer knew how much money he or she was owed and, accordingly, how to expect payment. Today, the only way is to apply directly to the center's employees, which at least puts lawyers in a humiliating position and ... creates dependence».
To overcome these problems, the UNBA Report proposes to amend the Law «On Free Legal Aid» and the Cabinet of Ministers Resolution No. 465 of 17.09.2014 «Issues of Payment for Services and Reimbursement of Expenses of Lawyers Providing Free Secondary Legal Aid» with the participation of the Bar, in particular, to establish the obligations of the FLA bodies to pay for the services provided with the regulation of clear deadlines and procedures, the algorithm for accepting acts of work performed for payment, their verification and resolving disputes over the amount of payment. It is also necessary to return to the practice of openness of information on payments for services rendered.
Popular news

Discussion
Without the protection of advocates, there will be no fair trials in Ukraine — forum in Odesa
Identifying an advocate with their client undermines the foundations of justice, as it deprives individuals of the opportunity to exercise their right to defense, forces advocates to avoid participating in high-profile cases, and ultimately renders procedural guarantees meaningless. Without this, fair trial is impossible.

Legislation
What data is sufficient to initiate an investigation – UNBA comments on draft law No. 12439
The problem of law enforcement pressure on business remains one of the most acute for the Ukrainian economy. The lack of regulation of certain procedures in the Criminal Procedure Code leads to abuses, as a result of which entrepreneurs find themselves in a state of legal uncertainty.

Guarantees of the practice of law
The Verkhovna Rada is waiting for the Minister of Justice to take action on signing the Convention on the protection of t…
Ukraine, which was directly involved in the preparation of the world's first Council of Europe Convention on the protection of the profession of advocate, has still not signed it. There appear to be no formal objections, but no real steps have been taken towards accession either.

Abroad
Australian advocate apologizes in court for fake AI quotes
In Australia, a royal advocate apologized to a judge for submitting documents in a criminal case against a teenager accused of murder that contained fabricated quotes and non-existent court decisions generated by artificial intelligence.

Legislation
Support for the defense industry should not upset local budgets, - UNBA
It is necessary to create additional incentives for enterprises in the defense and industrial complex, while ensuring the balance of the budget system and the predictability of both revenues and expenditures of local self-government.

Legislation
UNBA warns of extreme financial risks for defense industry companies
The lack of transparent control over the activities of the Ministry of Defense as a regulator, as well as excessive sanctions for leaving the Defense City regime, create risks for defense enterprises that could lead to their bankruptcy.

Guarantees of the practice of law
BCU reports interference by a member of the High Council of Justice in the activities of a lawyer and submits officia…
The Bar Council of Ukraine, having considered the statement of advocate Oleksandr Vikhrov, established the fact of interference by Roman Maselko, a member of the High Council of Justice, in the advocacy activities, violation of attorney-client privilege, and exceeding his powers in evaluating a candidate for the position of judge.

Legislation
Consent to arrest advocates must be given by bar self-regulatory bodies
Granting the High Council of Justice the power to give consent to the detention of an advocate or to keep him in custody would be a direct interference in the activities of the Ukrainian advocacy. This contradicts the principle of independence of the advocacy guaranteed by the Constitution and laws.
Publications

Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law

Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…

Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE

Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection

Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates

Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine

Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…

Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences