The peculiarities of publishing decisions of the QDCB were explained by the BCU
According to the Law on Access to Public Information, managers of such information are obliged to publish the acts they adopt. At the same time, the decisions made by the qualification and disciplinary commissions of the bar contain both attorney-client privilege and personal data.
The Bar Council of Ukraine provided its explanation at the request of the Odesa Oblast QDCB regarding the peculiarities of publishing acts of individual action (decisions) adopted by the regional QDCB and its chambers.
The BCU emphasized that adherence to the principle of confidentiality is a necessary and crucial prerequisite for a trusting relationship between a lawyer and a client, without which it is impossible to provide proper professional legal assistance, defense and representation. Therefore, maintaining the confidentiality of any information that is defined as the subject of the attorney-client privilege or constitutes personal data about an individual is, on the one hand, the right of the advocate in relations with all subjects of law who may require disclosure of such information, and, on the other hand, an obligation towards the client and those persons to whom this information relates.
And the Rules of Professional Conduct expressly prohibit the disclosure of information constituting the attorney-client privilege under any circumstances, including unlawful attempts by pre-trial investigation authorities and the court to question the attorney about the circumstances constituting the attorney-client privilege.
Personal data is classified as confidential information. In accordance with the Law «On Personal Data Protection», their dissemination without the consent of the personal data subject or his/her authorized person is allowed only in cases specified by law. And only in the interests of national security, economic welfare, human rights and for the purpose of conducting the All-Ukrainian Population Census. Protection of personal data is ensured by the party that disseminates this data.
The decisions of the qualification and disciplinary commissions of the Bar, which are made in the exercise of their powers, may contain confidential information that is not subject to disclosure in accordance with the Law «On Protection of Personal Data», attorney-client privilege within the meaning of the Law «On the Bar and Practice of Law», the disclosure of which is prohibited, proprietary information that is information with limited access, etc.
It is the information manager's responsibility to determine whether or not there are grounds for restricting access to information. The managerial will of the public information administrator in the form of denial or restriction of access to information must be motivated by the criteria for restricting information in accordance with the provisions of Article 6 of the Law «On Access to Public Information» (the so-called three-part test) and Article 3(1) and (2) of the Council of Europe Convention on Access to Official Documents.
At the same time, information is subject to restricted access, not a document. If a document contains information with restricted access, information with unrestricted access is provided for review. That is, in this case, a copy of the document is provided in accordance with the procedure established by law, with the part of the information to which access is restricted being closed (deleted or retouched (leaving the relevant sections blank).
Therefore, the Higher Qualification and Disciplinary Commission of the Bar and the qualification and disciplinary commissions of the regional bar, when publishing (disseminating) information that is legally the subject of attorney-client privilege or confidential information, must ensure compliance with the requirements of the legislatively established regime for the protection of attorney-client privilege and confidential information by removing restricted information by retouching or otherwise, as well as taking into account all the requirements of the «three-part test».
The Decision of the Bar Council of Ukraine dated 21.06.2024 No. 46 «On Consideration of the Appeal of the Head of the Qualification and Disciplinary Commission of the Bar of Odesa Region N. Rudnytska» can be viewed at the link.
As a reminder, on August 14, representatives of the Office of the Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights conducted a training on «Application of the three-part test in the activities of bar self-government bodies in access to public information» for the Secretariat of the Ukrainian National Bar Association and the Bar Qualification and Disciplinary Commissions.
Popular news
Educational events
The right of minors to marry: how judicial oversight works
The issue of granting minors the right to marry lies at the intersection of family law, child protection, and judicial discretion. The UNBA Committee on family law dedicated a webinar held on March 30 to this very topic.
Self-government
BCU: The HCJ’s decisions undermine the constitutional guarantees of the independence of the advocacy profession
The Bar Council of Ukraine has concluded that, in its recent decisions, the High Council of Justice has, without legal grounds, called into question the right of bar self-governing bodies to protect the guarantees of legal practice and has, in effect, attempted to grant one of its members — who retains the status of an advocate — special immunity from the Rules of professional conduct and disciplinary responsibility.
Interaction
The UNBA and the National Guard have agreed to cooperate on legal protection for military personnel
Servicemembers of the National Guard, their family members, and veterans are to receive additional legal tools to protect their rights, while the National Guard’s legal services will receive methodological and expert support.
Interaction
Protecting the rights of service members: The UNBA and the Military Ombudsman have agreed on cooperation
Servicemembers, reservists, conscripts during training exercises, members of local community volunteer units, and other individuals covered by the Law «On the Military Ombudsman» should have better access to professional legal assistance.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Reform without data and advocacy: what the Ministry of Justice’s launch has revealed
The Ministry of Justice hosted the first meeting of the working group on bar reform. But instead of professional preparation of legislative changes, we saw exactly what Armada Network Director Dale Armstrong had spoken about the day before in Kyiv: not reform, but a struggle for control over the agenda through a narrow circle of “stakeholders” who create an echo chamber of influence for themselves.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Advocacy, European integration and the limits of intervention: an American report presented in Kyiv
Following its presentation in Brussels, the report «The Ukrainian advocacy in the context of the rule of law and European integration» made its way to Kyiv. It highlighted critical issues both in understanding the very nature of the self-governing profession and in the emergence of a «shadow market» surrounding the Ukrainian advocacy.
Discussion
ETAIDF and MMC: where the system fails
The new system for assessing a person’s daily functioning and the practice of undergoing medical-legal examinations have already raised numerous questions — ranging from unclear procedures to difficulties in appealing decisions. These issues were examined by advocates during the roundtable discussion «Problematic issues of the ETAIDF and MMC», organized by the UNBA Committee on the protection of the rights of persons with disabilities and the All-Ukrainian public organization «Human rights union of persons with disabilities».
Rule of Law Roadmap
Access to the advocate profession: a subgroup has identified the direction of change
On Monday, March 16, a meeting was held of the subgroup «Access to the profession and training of advocates. Organizational forms of legal practice» of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates