The peculiarities of publishing decisions of the QDCB were explained by the BCU

Advocacy
16:31 Tue 20.08.24 302 Reviews
Print

According to the Law on Access to Public Information, managers of such information are obliged to publish the acts they adopt. At the same time, the decisions made by the qualification and disciplinary commissions of the bar contain both attorney-client privilege and personal data.

The Bar Council of Ukraine provided its explanation at the request of the Odesa Oblast QDCB regarding the peculiarities of publishing acts of individual action (decisions) adopted by the regional QDCB and its chambers.

The BCU emphasized that adherence to the principle of confidentiality is a necessary and crucial prerequisite for a trusting relationship between a lawyer and a client, without which it is impossible to provide proper professional legal assistance, defense and representation. Therefore, maintaining the confidentiality of any information that is defined as the subject of the attorney-client privilege or constitutes personal data about an individual is, on the one hand, the right of the advocate in relations with all subjects of law who may require disclosure of such information, and, on the other hand, an obligation towards the client and those persons to whom this information relates.

And the Rules of Professional Conduct expressly prohibit the disclosure of information constituting the attorney-client privilege under any circumstances, including unlawful attempts by pre-trial investigation authorities and the court to question the attorney about the circumstances constituting the attorney-client privilege.

Personal data is classified as confidential information. In accordance with the Law «On Personal Data Protection», their dissemination without the consent of the personal data subject or his/her authorized person is allowed only in cases specified by law. And only in the interests of national security, economic welfare, human rights and for the purpose of conducting the All-Ukrainian Population Census. Protection of personal data is ensured by the party that disseminates this data.

The decisions of the qualification and disciplinary commissions of the Bar, which are made in the exercise of their powers, may contain confidential information that is not subject to disclosure in accordance with the Law «On Protection of Personal Data», attorney-client privilege within the meaning of the Law «On the Bar and Practice of Law», the disclosure of which is prohibited, proprietary information that is information with limited access, etc.

It is the information manager's responsibility to determine whether or not there are grounds for restricting access to information. The managerial will of the public information administrator in the form of denial or restriction of access to information must be motivated by the criteria for restricting information in accordance with the provisions of Article 6 of the Law «On Access to Public Information» (the so-called three-part test) and Article 3(1) and (2) of the Council of Europe Convention on Access to Official Documents.

At the same time, information is subject to restricted access, not a document. If a document contains information with restricted access, information with unrestricted access is provided for review. That is, in this case, a copy of the document is provided in accordance with the procedure established by law, with the part of the information to which access is restricted being closed (deleted or retouched (leaving the relevant sections blank).

Therefore, the Higher Qualification and Disciplinary Commission of the Bar and the qualification and disciplinary commissions of the regional bar, when publishing (disseminating) information that is legally the subject of attorney-client privilege or confidential information, must ensure compliance with the requirements of the legislatively established regime for the protection of attorney-client privilege and confidential information by removing restricted information by retouching or otherwise, as well as taking into account all the requirements of the «three-part test».

The Decision of the Bar Council of Ukraine dated 21.06.2024 No. 46 «On Consideration of the Appeal of the Head of the Qualification and Disciplinary Commission of the Bar of Odesa Region N. Rudnytska» can be viewed at the link.

As a reminder, on August 14, representatives of the Office of the Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights conducted a training on «Application of the three-part test in the activities of bar self-government bodies in access to public information» for the Secretariat of the Ukrainian National Bar Association and the Bar Qualification and Disciplinary Commissions.

Popular news

BCU strengthens its position on the right of advocate to prioritize cases

Practice of law

BCU strengthens its position on the right of advocate to prioritize cases

In legal practice, it is not uncommon for court hearings in different cases to be scheduled at the same time. This raises the question: which case should the advocate attend first, and can the court interfere with this decision?

13:12 Tue 28.10.25 106
Advocate or lobbyist? The UNBA has presented a guide to distinguishing between the professions

Edition

Advocate or lobbyist? The UNBA has presented a guide to distinguishing between the professions

The Ukrainian National Bar Association has prepared a guide that helps distinguish between the legal status of an advocate and a lobbyist, explains the limits of permissible activities for each, and prevents possible violations of ethical and legal standards when participating in public policy-making.

18:42 Fri 24.10.25 160
Essay contest on the synergy of human and artificial intelligence in diplomacy has begun

Announcements

Essay contest on the synergy of human and artificial intelligence in diplomacy has begun

The Educational and Scientific Institute of International Relations at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv invites students from higher education institutions in Ukraine to participate in the Second All-Ukrainian essay competition on the topic «Modern Ukrainian diplomacy: synergy of human and artificial intelligence in defending national interests».

17:48 Fri 24.10.25 155
Where is the line between respect for the court and the dignity of an advocate?

Abroad

Where is the line between respect for the court and the dignity of an advocate?

Ukrainian advocates sometimes complain about condescending attitudes or tactless remarks from judges. But such conflicts are not unique to Ukraine. In various countries, advocates raise issues of communication culture in court, mutual respect, and the inadmissibility of humiliating participants.

15:13 Fri 24.10.25 148
Occupational safety during wartime: legal risks and employer liability

Discussion

Occupational safety during wartime: legal risks and employer liability

On October 21, the National Bar Association of Ukraine held a round table discussion on «Occupational safety in conditions of martial law». Participants discussed how the war has changed the requirements for safe working conditions, what guarantees remain for employees, and what responsibility employers bear for violations of legislation in this area.

13:17 Fri 24.10.25 198
The Czech advocacy has spoken out in defense of the professional independence of its Ukrainian colleagues

Abroad

The Czech advocacy has spoken out in defense of the professional independence of its Ukrainian colleagues

The Czech Bar Association (Česká advokátní komora, ČAK) will appeal to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Ukrainian authorities to ensure the preservation of the independence of advocacy in Ukraine.

17:28 Wed 22.10.25 196
When agreement is (im)possible: family disputes involving military personnel

Legal defence of military personnel

When agreement is (im)possible: family disputes involving military personnel

The number of family cases involving military personnel is growing, with the most common issues being divorce, division of joint property, alimony, deprivation or contestation of parental rights, adoption, establishment of guardianship, and cases related to domestic violence.

12:03 Wed 22.10.25 164
Marina Stavniychuk: The UNBA is a professional organization, not a monopoly

Self-government

Marina Stavniychuk: The UNBA is a professional organization, not a monopoly

A unitary state requires uniform standards for access to the profession and disciplinary responsibility, which is why the Ukrainian National Bar Association acts as a professional organization. Accusations of monopoly are false, because public associations cannot replace professional self-government.

13:32 Tue 21.10.25 156

Надішліть файл із текстом публікації у форматі *.doc, фотографію за тематикою у розмірі 640х400 та Ваше фото.

Оберіть файл