The peculiarities of publishing decisions of the QDCB were explained by the BCU

Advocacy
16:31 Tue 20.08.24 362 Reviews
Print

According to the Law on Access to Public Information, managers of such information are obliged to publish the acts they adopt. At the same time, the decisions made by the qualification and disciplinary commissions of the bar contain both attorney-client privilege and personal data.

The Bar Council of Ukraine provided its explanation at the request of the Odesa Oblast QDCB regarding the peculiarities of publishing acts of individual action (decisions) adopted by the regional QDCB and its chambers.

The BCU emphasized that adherence to the principle of confidentiality is a necessary and crucial prerequisite for a trusting relationship between a lawyer and a client, without which it is impossible to provide proper professional legal assistance, defense and representation. Therefore, maintaining the confidentiality of any information that is defined as the subject of the attorney-client privilege or constitutes personal data about an individual is, on the one hand, the right of the advocate in relations with all subjects of law who may require disclosure of such information, and, on the other hand, an obligation towards the client and those persons to whom this information relates.

And the Rules of Professional Conduct expressly prohibit the disclosure of information constituting the attorney-client privilege under any circumstances, including unlawful attempts by pre-trial investigation authorities and the court to question the attorney about the circumstances constituting the attorney-client privilege.

Personal data is classified as confidential information. In accordance with the Law «On Personal Data Protection», their dissemination without the consent of the personal data subject or his/her authorized person is allowed only in cases specified by law. And only in the interests of national security, economic welfare, human rights and for the purpose of conducting the All-Ukrainian Population Census. Protection of personal data is ensured by the party that disseminates this data.

The decisions of the qualification and disciplinary commissions of the Bar, which are made in the exercise of their powers, may contain confidential information that is not subject to disclosure in accordance with the Law «On Protection of Personal Data», attorney-client privilege within the meaning of the Law «On the Bar and Practice of Law», the disclosure of which is prohibited, proprietary information that is information with limited access, etc.

It is the information manager's responsibility to determine whether or not there are grounds for restricting access to information. The managerial will of the public information administrator in the form of denial or restriction of access to information must be motivated by the criteria for restricting information in accordance with the provisions of Article 6 of the Law «On Access to Public Information» (the so-called three-part test) and Article 3(1) and (2) of the Council of Europe Convention on Access to Official Documents.

At the same time, information is subject to restricted access, not a document. If a document contains information with restricted access, information with unrestricted access is provided for review. That is, in this case, a copy of the document is provided in accordance with the procedure established by law, with the part of the information to which access is restricted being closed (deleted or retouched (leaving the relevant sections blank).

Therefore, the Higher Qualification and Disciplinary Commission of the Bar and the qualification and disciplinary commissions of the regional bar, when publishing (disseminating) information that is legally the subject of attorney-client privilege or confidential information, must ensure compliance with the requirements of the legislatively established regime for the protection of attorney-client privilege and confidential information by removing restricted information by retouching or otherwise, as well as taking into account all the requirements of the «three-part test».

The Decision of the Bar Council of Ukraine dated 21.06.2024 No. 46 «On Consideration of the Appeal of the Head of the Qualification and Disciplinary Commission of the Bar of Odesa Region N. Rudnytska» can be viewed at the link.

As a reminder, on August 14, representatives of the Office of the Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights conducted a training on «Application of the three-part test in the activities of bar self-government bodies in access to public information» for the Secretariat of the Ukrainian National Bar Association and the Bar Qualification and Disciplinary Commissions.

Popular news

BCU: NACP initiatives regarding advocacy are unconstitutional interference

Self-government

BCU: NACP initiatives regarding advocacy are unconstitutional interference

The Bar Council of Ukraine has condemned the initiatives to reform the advocacy proposed by the National Agency for Corruption Prevention as direct, gross, and systematic interference by the executive branch in the activities of an independent constitutional institution.

14:21 Wed 31.12.25 113
UNBA program for implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law published

Self-government

UNBA program for implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law published

In order to ensure the implementation of measures set out in the Roadmap on the Rule of Law, the Bar Council of Ukraine approved a program for its implementation in relation to the reform of advocacy.

14:56 Tue 23.12.25 134
Access to advocate contacts in URAU has been restored

URAU

Access to advocate contacts in URAU has been restored

The Bar Council of Ukraine has opened up public access to data from the Unified Register of Advocates of Ukraine, which was closed at the start of the full-scale invasion in 2022. The decision was made at a meeting on December 12–13.

16:59 Sat 13.12.25 257
Members of the QDCB are not required to submit declarations - BCU

Self-government

Members of the QDCB are not required to submit declarations - BCU

Bar Council of Ukraine examined the legal status of members of bar self-government bodies and found that they are not required to submit declarations of persons authorized to perform functions of state or local self-government.

18:07 Fri 12.12.25 158
BCU has identified 12 areas for implementing the Roadmap for advocacy

Self-government

BCU has identified 12 areas for implementing the Roadmap for advocacy

During its meeting on December 12, the Bar Council of Ukraine considered the Roadmap on the Rule of Law, approved by Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 475-r dated May 14, 2025. The document provides for the development and adoption of a draft law on improving the legal regulation of advocacy by the fourth quarter of 2026.

13:34 Fri 12.12.25 212
The Ombudsman acknowledged the problem of violation of the human right to legal aid in the TCC

Guarantees of the practice of law

The Ombudsman acknowledged the problem of violation of the human right to legal aid in the TCC

The Verkhovna Rada Commissioner for human rights Dmytro Lubinets confirmed the existence of a problem with ensuring the constitutional right to professional legal assistance in territorial recruitment and social support centers.

19:06 Thu 11.12.25 228
The agreement on the provision of legal assistance is not public – BCU

Guarantees of the practice of law

The agreement on the provision of legal assistance is not public – BCU

Bar Council of Ukraine in its decision No. 111 dated October 18, 2025, responded to questions regarding the possibility of concluding legal assistance agreements by accepting a public offer, using an electronic form of the agreement, and posting information about legal assistance on websites.

16:09 Tue 09.12.25 122
Why preventive measures have turned into preventive punishment in Ukraine: round table discussion

Discussion

Why preventive measures have turned into preventive punishment in Ukraine: round table discussion

The European approach, enshrined in the CPC, provides for detention as an exceptional preventive measure: courts must prove the impossibility of milder alternatives and carefully assess the risks. In practice, however, it is increasingly being applied almost automatically, eroding standards of freedom.

18:44 Fri 05.12.25 157

Надішліть файл із текстом публікації у форматі *.doc, фотографію за тематикою у розмірі 640х400 та Ваше фото.

Оберіть файл