Exemption from payment of fees in 2025: what advocates should know
The Bar Council of the region and the Ukrainian National Bar Association may, upon the applications of advocates submitted by December 31, decide to exempt, reduce, or defer the payment of the annual fee for the implementation of the bar self-government.
The issue is regulated by the Regulation on Contributions to the Bar Self-Government, approved by the BCU Decision No. 4 of February 3, 2017.
The conditions for dismissal are financial insolvency of the advocate, his or her financial condition, as well as other factual circumstances.
The following persons are entitled to benefits:
- persons with disabilities of groups I and II;
- persons with disabilities as a result of war, participants in hostilities (including persons who participated in hostilities in the territories of other states)
- persons who took part in the liquidation of the consequences of the Chernobyl NPP accident of categories I and II;
- persons who are forced to leave or abandon their place of residence as a result of or in order to avoid the negative consequences of armed conflict, temporary occupation and have acquired the appropriate status.
Original applications of advocates (applications signed with the help of an electronic digital signature) for exemption, reduction or deferral of the annual fee for the bar self-government will be considered by the bar councils of the region, the Bar Council of Ukraine/National Bar Association of Ukraine until January 31, 2025.
The decision is made if the bar self-government body has the financial capacity, if the provision of such benefits does not create obstacles to its normal activities, and if there are supporting documents of the applicant's relevant status and financial situation.
In 2025, the annual contribution to the bar self-government will continue to be one subsistence minimum for able-bodied persons (UAH 3,028, according to the Law on the State Budget). At the same time, its distribution will change. The payment of the fee is a professional obligation of an attorney. This obligation must be fulfilled by January 31, 2025 by transferring funds in two payments to the bank accounts of the bar self-government bodies. The new distribution will take into account the number of advocates in the regional bar councils as a criterion.
The regional bar council may grant the advocate an installment plan for the payment of the annual fee, provided that it is paid in equal installments in the first decade of each quarter of the current year. The decision on granting an installment plan for the payment of the annual fee shall be made by the regional bar council provided that the advocate is reasonably and documentedly unable to pay the annual fee in one payment.
Popular news
Interaction
Protecting the rights of service members: The UNBA and the Military Ombudsman have agreed on cooperation
Servicemembers, reservists, conscripts during training exercises, members of local community volunteer units, and other individuals covered by the Law «On the Military Ombudsman» should have better access to professional legal assistance.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Reform without data and advocacy: what the Ministry of Justice’s launch has revealed
The Ministry of Justice hosted the first meeting of the working group on bar reform. But instead of professional preparation of legislative changes, we saw exactly what Armada Network Director Dale Armstrong had spoken about the day before in Kyiv: not reform, but a struggle for control over the agenda through a narrow circle of “stakeholders” who create an echo chamber of influence for themselves.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Advocacy, European integration and the limits of intervention: an American report presented in Kyiv
Following its presentation in Brussels, the report «The Ukrainian advocacy in the context of the rule of law and European integration» made its way to Kyiv. It highlighted critical issues both in understanding the very nature of the self-governing profession and in the emergence of a «shadow market» surrounding the Ukrainian advocacy.
Discussion
ETAIDF and MMC: where the system fails
The new system for assessing a person’s daily functioning and the practice of undergoing medical-legal examinations have already raised numerous questions — ranging from unclear procedures to difficulties in appealing decisions. These issues were examined by advocates during the roundtable discussion «Problematic issues of the ETAIDF and MMC», organized by the UNBA Committee on the protection of the rights of persons with disabilities and the All-Ukrainian public organization «Human rights union of persons with disabilities».
Rule of Law Roadmap
Access to the advocate profession: a subgroup has identified the direction of change
On Monday, March 16, a meeting was held of the subgroup «Access to the profession and training of advocates. Organizational forms of legal practice» of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Organization of advocacy: subgroup agrees on approaches to regulatory reform
On March 13, a meeting was held of the «Organization of the advocacy and self-government» subgroup of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap regarding bar reform. The event was conducted via videoconference.
Abroad
Where does legal information end and legal assistance begin?
Law firms find themselves in a dilemma: they want to make the most of artificial intelligence, but at the same time, more and more people are entrusting their legal matters to large language models. And this, as experts point out, entails countless risks.
Guarantees of the practice of law
During a search of an advocate's office in Kyiv a telephone was seized and personal records were examined
Detectives from the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine conducted a search of the office of a Kyiv law firm as part of criminal proceedings under Part 1 of Article 366-2 (False Declaration) and Article 368-5 (Illegal Enrichment) of the Criminal Code.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
